The workspace where your team aligns on what to build, hands it to AI coding agents, and keeps everyone in the loop — engineers, managers, PMs — in one place.
01 · Plan together
The workspace
Specs, RFCs, walkthroughs in one tree. Your whole team contributes before a line of code is written.
Sarah Chen
Burn old token on rotate — no grace period.
Maya Johnson
We'll need server-side validation on every refresh.
02 · Hand off → 03 · Implement
The CLI
Engineer pulls the approved context. The agent has the full picture from day one. Push the result back when done.
04 · See the result
The dashboard
Structured summaries — PRs, decisions, integration notes — written by the agent. Everyone in the loop without a standup.
PR #482 · Token rotation
Burned old token on rotate, added 401 path, emits theft event. Aligned with RFC.
Decisions
No grace period (per Sarah's review). Backfill on next deploy.
From half-baked idea to shipped feature — without context loss between any of the humans or the agents.
Write specs, attach videos, debate context — together.
Engineer pulls approved context via CLI to the agent.
Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex builds with full context.
Engineer pushes a structured summary to the dashboard.
Comment with video, audio, text. Threaded per block.
Someone writes a great spec in a doc. Engineers never read it. The agent definitely never read it. Three weeks later, someone builds the wrong thing and everyone wonders why.
Your engineer ships something brilliant. Your PM finds out in the standup two days later. The context lives in PRs. The decisions live in someone's head. The stakeholders live in spreadsheets.
AI agents made coding faster. They didn't make teams more aligned.
15 minutes every day to learn what already happened.
Half the team zones out. The PM takes notes nobody reads.
“Wrapped up the auth integration.” Cool — but what changed?
No decisions logged. No context for the next person. The migration dependency is invisible until it breaks.
Your senior engineer is now a help desk.
Every new hire, every PM, every manager walks over with the same question. The answer never gets written down.
There's a better loop. Your agents already have the context. Let them write the update. Your team reads it, discusses it, approves it. Next cycle starts where the last one ended.
Your team plans on the web. Your engineers and their agents read and write through the CLI. Same tree. Same context. No copy-pasting between tools.
Works inside Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex. No extra docs to write — the agent does the summarizing.
Live preview
Engineers, managers, PMs, leadership — one workspace, one cycle, one source of truth.
Every cycle ends with a structured summary. PRs, decisions, integration notes — visible without a standup.
PR #482 · Token rotation
90 LOC · summarized
PR #479 · Webhook retry queue
142 LOC · summarized
PR #475 · OAuth providers
210 LOC · summarized
Add video walkthroughs and acceptance criteria once — they travel with the work, all the way to the agent.
Acceptance criteria
User sees error toast on declined card
Retry preserves form state
Anna · 1m walkthrough
“Here's the empty state I want…”
No more writing docs for non-technical stakeholders. Your agent summarizes; the dashboard tells the rest.
Drop in any time. See what shipped, what changed, what the team decided — without scheduling a meeting.
Q3 launch · status
12
Shipped
4
In flight
0
Blocked
| Capability | Standups | Slack | "Just ask them" | YouBrifly |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real-timeReal-time | Partial | |||
| Written byWritten by | Human | Human | Nobody | Agent + team |
| CurrentStays current | ||||
| Non-engWorks for non-engineers | Partial | |||
| Agent-readableAgent can read it | ||||
| AnchoredAnchored to the work | ||||
| AI chatAI chat on full context | Partial |
One workspace. Every agent. Every teammate.
We onboard teams in small cohorts — not to create scarcity, but because we set up every team properly before they go deep. You'll get a setup call, a starter tree built for your stack, and a direct line to us while we're small.
We're looking for teams actively using Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex who have felt the alignment problem firsthand.
Brifly